Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ; (12): 440-445, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-964472

ABSTRACT

@#Due to advances in digital technology, intraoral impressions have been increasingly used to fabricate implant restorations because of its simplicity, high efficiency, comfortableness and convenience. In clinical practice, the accuracy of intraoral impressions depends on various factors, including scanner technique, status of dentition and implants, auxiliary devices, materials and environment, which might influence its accuracy and limit its application. When applied to patients missing more teeth, its accuracy may be insufficient. It is suggested that intraoral impressions be used cautiously when there are multiple and far apart implants and that the scan body not be tightened excessively and that maintain appropriate environmental conditions. In this article, we have reviewed recent relevant literature and the factors affecting the accuracy of intraoral impressions for implant restoration.

2.
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ; (12): 463-467, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-822179

ABSTRACT

@#Since the digital impression technique has already been widely used in dental therapy, it has grown into a popular option among implant practitioners. The advantages of the digital impression technique are as follows: better experience for patients during the treatment; less chair-side time consumption; and reliability in making the precise impression. Thus, we reviewed the relevant factors that impact the precision of the digital impression technique and introduced its influence mechanism through an evidence-based method that was based on analyzing in vitro and in vivo literature published within the previous 5 years, with a focus on such considerations as relevant factors to dentists, digital impression systems, patients, and the environment. A review of the literature showed that the main factors that have a large influence on impression precision are imaging techniques and the software for the impression system. However, due to the development of impression systems that are restricted at scientific and technological levels, impression precision is affected by multiple factors, such as scanning techniques, dentist operation proficiency, material and contours of scanbodies, patient conditions, and ambient light. Dentists are advised to scientifically choose the impression system, limit ambient light and adopt direct techniques that could enhance impression precision. In the future, the development of impression systems could reduce the systematic errors, decrease the operating complexity of dentists, and improve impression precision.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL